More Books by Administrative Order, Continuity

1965 Mar 09 Appointment of Guardian
1966 May 27 Guardianship and the UHJ
1974 Jul 25 Infallibility of the Guardian
1977 Aug 22 Clarification on Infallibility
1981 Jan 2-4 Counsellors Conference in Langenhain
1983 Oct 23 Social and Economic Development
1984 Oct 25 Universal House of Justice - Power of Elucidation
1988 May 31 UHJ Letter to NSA New Zealand
1988 May 31 Women and UHJ Membership
1988 Sept 25 Function of Research Department Various terms
1989 Aug 27 UHJ Letter 19 day Feast
1989 Aug 28 Issues Related to the Nineteen Day Feast
1993 Feb 14 Membership in Amnesty International
1993 Feb 7 Issues concerning community functioning
1994 May 19 response to US NSA
1994 Oct 10 External Affairs Strategy
1995 Apr 27 Separation of Church and State
1995 Mar 14 Language Concerns of Persian Friend in Australia
1995 May 18 Administration by Email
1995 May 18 Making Suggestions
1996 Aug 02 Confidentiality and Spiritual Assemblies
1996 Feb 18 Authority of the Universal House of Justice
1996 Jul 2 UHJ Criticism
1996 Jul 24 Dating of Will and Testament of Abdu'l-Baha
1996 July 02 Criticism of Institutions
1996 Jun 14 Infallibility Women on House of Justice
1996 Oct 22 Authentication and Authority
1997 Jan 31 Mason Remey and Those who Followed him
1997 Jun 03 Interpretational Authority of the House of Justice
1997 June 04 Covenant-Breaking and the Hands
1997 Mar 30 Meaning of 'Umumi re UHJ Membership
1997 May 30 Creation of Regional Baha'i Counsels
1998 Feb 08 Materialistic Elements in Academic Scholarship
1999 Feb 22 Rank of Counsellors
1999 Mar 01 Breaking a Tie Vote - Who Constitute Minorities
2000 Oct 29 Tranquility Zones
2000 Sept 29 Continental Pioneer Committees
2001 Apr 10 UHJ 19 Day Feast
2001 Dec 20 ITC Us BC Americas Clusters
2001 Dec 20 UHJ Us BC Americas Clusters
2001 Jan 29 UHJ Institution of the counselors
2001 Jan 29 UHJ Withdrawal
2002 Jul 30 Revised - Development of Institution of Huququ'llah
Administrative Committees
Free Interfaith Software

Web - Windows - iPhone








Administrative Order, Continuity : 1995 Apr 27 Separation of Church and State
The Universal House of Justice
The Bahá'í World Centre
Department of the Secretariat
27 April 1995
Separation of Church and State
Mr. Sen McGlinn
[address outdated]
Dear Bahá'í Friend,

Your email of 19 February 1995 addressed to the Research Department was referred to the Universal House of Justice. In it you quote two phrases which appear in a book you have recently read, and which seem from the context to be citations from Shoghi Effendi. These phrases are "Bahá'í theocracy" and "humanity will emerge from the immature civilization in which church and state are separate". You ask whether these references can be authenticated and dated. We have been instructed to send you the following reply.

A reference to "Bahá'í theocracy" is to be found in a letter written on behalf of the Guardian to an individual Bahá'í on 30 September 1949. This reads as follows:

He thinks your question is well put: what the

Guardian was referring to was the theocratic systems, such as

the Catholic Church and the Caliphate, which are not

divinely given as systems, but man-made, and yet, being

partly derived from the teachings of Christ and Muhammad

are in a sense theocracies. The Bahá'í theocracy, on the

contrary, is both divinely ordained as a system and, of

course, based on the teachings of the Prophet Himself.

The other passage does not comprise words of Shoghi Effendi, although its purport was approved by him. As you yourself have since discovered, it can be found in The Bahá'í World, volume VI, on page 199, in a statement entitled "concerning Membership in Non-Bahá'í Religious Organizations", about which the Guardian's secretary had written on his behalf on 11 December 1935: "The Guardian has carefully read the copy of the statement you had recently prepared concerning non-membership in non-Bahá'í religious organizations, and is pleased to realize that your comments and explanations are in full conformity with his views on the subject."

The complete paragraph in which the words appear is as follows:

In the light of these words,[1] it seems fully evident

that the way to approach this instruction is in realizing the

Faith of Bahá'u'lláh as an every-growing organism destined

to become something new and greater than any of the

revealed religions of the past. Whereas former Faiths

inspired hearts and illumined souls, they eventuated in

formal religions with an ecclesiastical organization, creeds,

rituals and churches, while the Faith of Bahá'u'lláh, likewise

renewing man's spiritual life, will gradually produce the

institutions of an ordered society, fulfilling not merely the

function of the churches of the past but also the function of

the civil state. By this manifestation of the Divine Will in a

higher degree than in former ages, humanity will emerge

from that immature civilization in which church and state are

separate and competitive institutions, and partake of a true

civilization in which spiritual and social principles are at last

reconciled as two aspects of one and the same Truth.

You also ask how these statements could be reconciled with Shoghi Effendi's comment on page 149 of Bahá'í Administration, which appears to anticipate "a future that is sure to witness the formal and complete separation of Church and State", and with the following words in his letter of 21 March 1932 addressed to the Bahá'ís of the United States and Canada:[2]

Theirs is not the purpose, while endeavoring to conduct and

perfect the administrative affairs of their Faith, to violate,

under any circumstances, the provisions of their country's

constitution, much less to allow the machinery of their

administration to supersede the government of their

respective countries.

A careful reading of the letter dated 6 December 1928 in which the Guardian's comment about the separation of Church and State occurs would suggest that, rather than enunciating a general principle, Shoghi Effendi is simply reviewing "the quickening forces of internal reform" that had "recently transpired throughout the Near and Middle East", and enumerating a number of factors that impinge on the development of the Faith in those parts of the world.[3]

As for the statement made by Shoghi Effendi in his letter of 21 March 1932, the well-established principles of the Faith concerning the relationship of the Bahá'í institutions to those of the country in which the Bahá'ís reside make it unthinkable that they would ever purpose to violate a country's constitution or so to meddle in its political machinery as to attempt to take over the powers of government. This is an integral element of the Bahá'í principle of abstention from involvement in politics. However, this does not by any means imply that the country itself may not, by constitutional means, decide to adopt Bahá'í laws and practices and modify its constitution or method of government accordingly. the relationship between the principle of abstention from involvement in politics and the emergence of the Bahá'í State is commented on later in this letter. In the meantime we can quote the following extracts from letters written on behalf of the Guardian in response to queries from individual believers, which indicate that the relationship is an evolving one:

Regarding the question raised in your letter, Shoghi

Effendi believes that for the present the Movement, whether

in the East or the West, should be dissociated entirely from

politics. This was the explicit injunction of 'Abdu'l-Bahá...

Eventually, however, as you have rightly conceived it, the

Movement will, as soon as it is fully developed and

recognized, embrace both religious and political issues. In

fact Bahá'u'lláh clearly states that affairs of state as well as

religious questions are to be referred to the House of Justice

into which the Assemblies of the Bahá'ís will eventually

evolve. (30 November 1930)

The Bahá'ís will be called upon to assume the reins

of government when they will come to constitute the

majority of the population in a given country, and even then

their participation in political affairs is bound to be limited

in scope unless they obtain a similar majority in some other

countries as well. (19 November 1939)

The Bahá'ís must remain non-partisan in all political

affairs. In the distant future, however, when the majority of a

country have become Bahá'ís then it will lead to the

establishment of a Bahá'í State. (19 April 1941)

A proper understanding of all the above passages, and of their implications, requires an acceptance of two fundamental principles for the exegesis of Bahá'í Texts.

The first, which derives from the Covenant, is the principle that the writings of 'Abdu'l-Bahá and the Guardian are thoroughly imbued with the spirit of the Revelation of Bahá'u'lláh and intimately linked with the Teachings of Bahá'u'lláh Himself. this principle is clearly expounded in two paragraphs from a letter written on behalf of the Guardian to an individual believer on 19 March 1946:

Whatever the Master has said is based on the

teachings of Bahá'u'lláh. He was the perfect Interpreter, had

lived with Him all His life; therefore what He says has the

same standing, even if a text of Bahá'u'lláh is not available

...
We must take the teachings as a great, balanced

whole, not seek out and oppose to each other two strong

statements that have different meanings; somewhere in

between, there are links uniting the two. That is what makes

our Faith so flexible and well balanced. for instance there are

calamities for testing and for punishment -- there are also

accidents, plain cause and effect!

Bahá'u'lláh has given us a Revelation designed to raise mankind to heights never before attained. It is little wonder that the minds of individual believers, no matter how perceptive, have difficulty in comprehending its range. It is the words of 'Abdu'l-Bahá and the Guardian which elucidate this vast Revelation and make clear the manner in which different statements relate to one another and what is implied by the Revealed Word. Without the bright light of the Covenant, this Faith, like all those before it, would be torn to pieces by the conflicting opinions of scholars applying limited human reasoning to divinely revealed truths.

The second fundamental principle which enables us to understand the pattern towards which Bahá'u'lláh wishes human society to evolve is the principle of organic growth which requires that detailed developments, and the understanding of detailed developments, become available only with the passage of time and with the help of the guidance given by that Central Authority in the Cause to whom all must turn. In this regard one can use the simile of a tree. If a farmer plants a tree, he cannot state at that moment what its exact height will be, the number of its branches or the exact time of its blossoming. he can, however, give a general impression of its size and pattern of growth and can state with confidence which fruit it will bear. The same is true of the evolution of the World order of Bahá'u'lláh. For example, we find the following illuminating explanation in a letter written by Shoghi Effendi to the Bahá'ís in America on 23 February 1924:[4]

And as we make an effort to demonstrate that love to the

world may we also clear our minds of any lingering trace of

unhappy misunderstandings that might obscure our clear

conception of the exact purpose and methods of this new

world order, so challenging and complex, yet so consummate

and wise. We are called upon by our beloved Master in His

Will and Testament not only to adopt it unreservedly, but to

unveil its merit to all the world. To attempt to estimate its

full value, and grasp its exact significance after so short a

time since its inception would be premature and

presumptuous on our part. We must trust to time, and the

guidance of God's Universal House of Justice, to obtain a

clearer and fuller understanding of its provisions and

implications. But one word of warning must be uttered in

this connection. Let us be on our guard lest we measure too

strictly the Divine Plan with the standard of men. I am not

prepared to state that it agrees in principle or in method with

the prevailing notions now uppermost in men's minds, nor

that it should conform with those imperfect, precarious, and

expedient measures feverishly resorted to by agitated

humanity. Are we to doubt that the ways of God are not

necessarily the ways of man? Is not faith but another word

for implicit obedience, whole-hearted allegiance,

uncompromising adherence to that which we believe is the

revealed and express will of God, however perplexing

it might first appear, however at variance with the shadowy

views, the impotent doctrines, the crude theories, the idle

imaginings, the fashionable conceptions of a transient and

troublous age? If we are to falter or hesitate, if our love for

Him should fail to direct us and keep us within His path, if

we desert Divine and emphatic principles, what hope can we

any more cherish for healing the ills and sicknesses of this

world?

Pending the establishment of the Universal House of

Justice, whose function it is to lay more definitely the broad

lines that must guide the future activities and administration

of the Movement, it is clearly our duty to strive to obtain as

clear a view as possible of the manner in which to conduct

the affairs of the Cause, and then arise with

single-mindedness and determination to adopt and maintain

it in all our activities and labours.

At this time we have the benefit of many subsequent interpretations by Shoghi Effendi and also the initial guidance of the Universal House of Justice, which will continue to elucidate aspects of this mighty system as it unfolds. In striving to attain a "clearer and fuller understanding" of the World Order of Bahá'u'lláh, we need to contemplate the operation of the Bahá'í principles of governance and social responsibility as they persist through changing sets of conditions, from the present time when the Bahá'í community constitutes a small number of people living in a variety of overwhelmingly non-Bahá'í societies, to the far different situation in future centuries when the Bahá'ís are becoming, and eventually have become, the vast majority of the people.

The Administrative Order is certainly the nucleus and pattern of the World Order of Bahá'u'lláh, but it is in embryonic form, and must undergo major evolutionary developments in the course of time. Certain passages in the writings on this subject establish matters of principle, certain ones describe the ultimate goal of the Most Great Peace, and certain of the relate to stages of development on the way to the attainment of that goal. For example, in this familiar passage in His Will and Testament, 'Abdu'l-Bahá states:[5]

This House of Justice enacteth the laws and the government

enforceth them. The legislative body must reinforce the

executive, the executive must aid and assist the legislative

body so that through the close union and harmony of these

two forces, the foundation of fairness and justice may

become firm and strong, that all the regions of the world

may become even as Paradise itself.

In response to a question about the "government" in the above passage, Shoghi Effendi's secretary wrote on his behalf, on 18 April 1941, the following clarification:

By "Government" ... is meant the executive body which will

enforce the laws when the Bahá'í Faith has reached the point

when it is recognized and accepted entirely by any particular

nation.

The same relationship between legislature and executive is expressed in the well-known passage in "The Unfoldment of World civilization",[6] showing how one principle is applied over successive periods.

A world executive, backed by an international force, will

carry out the decisions arrived at, and apply the laws enacted

by, this world legislature, and will safeguard the organic

unity of the whole commonwealth.

In relation to other international institutions, the Guardian has given the following guidance:

Touching the point raised in the Secretary's letter

regarding the nature and scope of the Universal Court of

Arbitration, this and other similar matters will have to be

explained and elucidated by the Universal House of Justice,

to which, according to the Master's explicit Instructions, all

important fundamental questions must be referred.[7]

In his letter to the National Spiritual Assembly of the Bahá'ís of the United States and Canada written on 27 February 1929,[8] Shoghi Effendi stated:

Not only will the present-day Spiritual Assemblies be styled

differently in future, but they will be enabled also to add to

their present functions those powers, duties, and prerogatives

necessitated by the recognition of the Faith of Bahá'u'lláh,

not merely as one of the recognized religious systems of the

world, but as the State Religion of an independent and

Sovereign Power. And as the Bahá'í Faith permeates the

masses of the peoples of East and West, and its truth is

embraced by the majority of the peoples of a number of the

Sovereign States of the world, will the Universal House of

Justice attain the plenitude of its power, and exercise, as the

supreme organ of the Bahá'í Commonwealth, all the rights,

the duties, and responsibilities incumbent upon the world's

future superstate.

Complementing these words are [sic] the Guardian's repeated and forceful requirement that Bahá'ís strictly abstain from involvement in politics. This requirement has far-reaching implications for the method by which Bahá'u'lláh's Administrative Order will evolve into His World Order. We can consider, for example, the well-known passage in his letter of 21 March 1932 to the Bahá'ís in the United States and Canada:[9]

Let them refrain from associating themselves, whether by

word or by deed, with the political pursuits of their

respective nations, with the policies of their governments and

the schemes and programmes of parties and factions .... Let

them affirm their unyielding determination to stand, firmly

and unreservedly, for the way of Bahá'u'lláh, to avoid the

entanglements and bickerings inseparable from the pursuits

of the politician, and to become worthy agencies of that

Divine Polity which incarnates God's immutable Purpose for

all men....

...Let them beware lest, in their eagerness to further

the aims of their beloved Cause, they should be led

unwittingly to bargain with their Faith, to compromise with

their essential principles, or to sacrifice, in return for any

material advantage which their institutions may derive, the

integrity of their spiritual ideals.

As one studies these words, one begins to understand the processes at work in the gradual unfoldment and establishment of the Bahá'í System.

Clearly the establishment of the Kingdom of God on earth is a "political" enterprise, and the Teachings of the Faith are filled with "political" principles -- using the word in the sense of the science of government and of the organization of human society. At the same time the Bahá'í world community repeatedly and emphatically denies being a "political" organization, and Bahá'ís are required, on pain of deprivation of their administrative rights, to refrain from becoming involved in "political" matters and from taking sides in "political" disputes. In other words, the Bahá'ís are following a completely different path from that usually followed by those who wish to reform society. They eschew political methods towards the achievement of their aims, and concentrate on revitalizing the hearts, minds and behaviour of people and on presenting a working model as evidence of the reality and practicality of the way of life they propound.

The Bahá'í Administrative Order is the "nucleus and pattern" of the divinely intended future political system of the world, and undoubtedly non-Bahá'í governments will benefit from learning how this system works and from adopting its procedures and principles in overcoming the problems they face. nevertheless, this Administration is primarily the framework and structure designed to be a channel for the flow of the spirit of the Cause and for the application of its Teachings. As the Guardian wrote:[10]

It is surely for those to whose hands so priceless a heritage

has been committed to prayerfully watch lest the tool should

supersede the Faith itself, lest undue concern for the minute

details arising from the administration of the Cause obscure

the vision of its promoters, lest partiality, ambition, and

worldliness tend in the course of time to becloud the

radiance, stain the purity, and impair the effectiveness of the

Faith of Bahá'u'lláh.

The gradual process of the evolution of the Bahá'í Administrative Order into the World Order of Bahá'u'lláh has been described by Shoghi Effendi in many of his writings, as in the following excerpt from his letter of 30 April 1953 to the All- America Intercontinental Teaching Conference:[11]

This present Crusade, on the threshold of which we

now stand, will, moreover, by virtue of the dynamic forces it

will release and its wide repercussions over the entire surface

of the globe, contribute effectually to the acceleration of yet

another process of tremendous significance which will carry

the steadily evolving Faith of Bahá'u'lláh through its present

stages of obscurity, of repression, of emancipation and of

recognition -- stages one or another of which Bahá'í national

communities in various parts of the world now find

themselves [in] -- to the stage of establishment, the stage at

which the Faith of Bahá'u'lláh will be recognized by the civil

authorities as the State Religion, similar to that which

Christianity entered in the years following the death of the

Emperor Constantine, a stage which must later be followed

by the emergence of the Bahá'í state itself, functioning, in all

religious and civil matters, in strict accordance with the

Laws and Ordinances of the Kitáb-i-Aqdas, the Most Holy,

the Mother-Book of the Bahá'í Revelation, a stage which, in

the fullness of time, will culminate in the establishment of

the World Bahá'í Commonwealth, functioning in the

plenitude of its powers, and which will signalize the

long-awaited advent of the Christ-promised Kingdom of God

on earth -- the Kingdom of Bahá'u'lláh -- mirroring however

faintly upon this humble handful of dust the glories of the

Abha Kingdom.

In answer to those who raise objections to this vision of a worldwide commonwealth inspired by a Divine Revelation, fearing for the freedom of minority groups or of the individual under such a system, we can explain the Bahá'í principle of upholding the rights of minorities and fostering their interests. We can also point to the fact that no person is ever compelled to accept the Faith of Bahá'u'lláh and moreover, unlike the situation in certain other religions, each person has complete freedom to withdraw from the Faith if he decides that he no longer believes in its Founder or accepts His Teachings. In light of these facts alone it is evident that the growth of the Bahá'í communities to the size where a non-Bahá'í state would adopt the Faith as the State Religion, let alone to the point at which the State would accept the Law of God as its own law and the National House of Justice as its legislature, must be a supremely voluntary and democratic process.

As the Universal House of Justice wrote in its letter of 21 July 1968 to the National Spiritual Assembly of the Bahá'ís of the United States:

It is not our purpose to impose Bahá'í teachings upon others

by persuading the powers that be to enact laws enforcing

Bahá'í principles, nor to join movements which have such

legislation as their aim. The guidance that Bahá'í institutions

offer to mankind does not comprise a series of specific

answers to current problems, but rather the illumination of

an entirely new way of life. Without this way of life the

problems are insoluble; with it they will either not arise or,

if they arise, can be resolved.

Two quotations from the writings of the Guardian bear particularly on these principles of the rights and prerogatives of minorities and of individuals. In The Advent of Divine Justice is a passage which is of fundamental significance for Bahá'í constitutional law:[12]

Unlike the nations and peoples of the earth, be they of the

East or of the West, democratic or authoritarian, communist

or capitalist, whether belonging to the Old World or the

New, who either ignore, trample upon, or extirpate, the

racial, religious, or political minorities within the sphere of

their jurisdiction, every organized community enlisted under

the banner of Bahá'u'lláh should feel it to be its first and

inescapable obligation to nurture, encourage, and safeguard

every minority belonging to any faith, race, class, or nation

within it.

As for the protection of the rights of individuals, there is the following translation of a forceful passage which appears in a letter from Shoghi Effendi to the Bahá'ís of iran, written in July 1925, in relation to a situation involving a Covenant-breaker:

...the mere fact of disaffection, estrangement, or recantation

of belief, can in no wise detract from, or otherwise impinge

upon, the legitimate civil rights of individuals in a free

society, be it to the most insignificant degree. Were the

friends to follow other than this course, it would be

tantamount to a reversion on their part, in this century of

radiance and light, to the ways and standards of a former

age: they would reignite in men's breasts the fire of bigotry

and blind fanaticism, cut themselves off from the glorious

bestowals of this promised Day of God, and impede the full

flow of divine assistance in this wondrous age.

All Baha'is, and especially those who make a profound study of the Cause, need to grasp the differences between the Bahá'í concepts of governance and those of the past, and to abstain from measuring Bahá'í institutions and methods against the faulty man-made institutions and methods hitherto current in the world. The Guardian graphically stressed these differences in his letter of 8 February 1934, known as "The Dispensation of Bahá'u'lláh":[13]

The Bahá'í Commonwealth of the future, of which

this vast Administrative Order is the sole framework,

is, both in theory and practice, not only unique in the

entire history of political institutions, but can find no

parallel in the annals of any of the world's recognized

religious systems. No form of democratic
government; no system of autocracy or of

dictatorship, whether monarchical or republican; no

intermediary scheme of a purely aristocratic order;

nor even any of the recognized types of theocracy,

whether it be the Hebrew Commonwealth, or the

various Christian ecclesiastical organizations, or the

Imamate or the Caliphate in Islam -- none of these

can be identified or be said to conform with the
Administrative Order which the master-hand of its
perfect Architect has fashioned.

Among the many complementary Teachings in the Faith which resolve the dilemmas of past societies are those of the unity of mankind on the one hand, and loyalty to the covenant on the other. As already mentioned, no one in this Dispensation is compelled to be a Baha'i, and the division of humankind into the "clean" and the "unclean", the "faithful" and the "infidels", is abolished At the same time, anyone who does choose to be a Bahá'í accepts the Covenant of Bahá'u'lláh and, while free expression of opinion within the Bahá'í community is encouraged, this cannot ever be permitted to degenerate to the level of undermining the Covenant for this would vitiate the very purpose of the Revelation itself.

One of the major concerns of the Universal House of Justice, as the Bahá'í Administrative Order unfolds, will be to ensure that it evolves in consonance with the spirit of the Bahá'í Revelation. While many beneficial aspects of human society at large can be safely incorporated into Bahá'í Administration, the House of Justice will guard against the corrupting influence of those non-Bahá'í political and social concepts and practices which are not in harmony with the divine standard.

The House of Justice appreciates your concern about such a fundamental issue, and asks us to assure you of its prayers in the Holy Shrines for the confirmation of your services to the Cause of God.

With loving Bahá'í greetings,
For Department of the Secretariat

1. Reference to a letter of 15 June 1935 from Shoghi Effendi, published in the United States Bahá'í News, no. 95, October 1935, p. 2, and in Messages to America: Selected Letters and Cablegrams Addressed to the Bahá'ís of North America, 1932-1946 (Wilmette: Bahá'í Publishing Committee, 1947), pp. 4-5.

2. The World Order of Bahá'u'lláh: Selected Letters (Wilmette: Bahá'í Publishing Trust, 1991), p. 66.

3. Bahá'í Administration: Selected Messages 1922-1932 (Wilmette: Bahá'í Publishing Trust, 1974), p. 147.

4. Bahá'í Administration, p. 24

5. Will and Testament of 'Abdu'l-Bahá (Wilmette: Bahá'í Publishing Trust, 1971), pp. 14-15.

6. The World Order of Bahá'u'lláh, p. 203.
7. Bahá'í Administration, p. 47.
8. The World Order of Bahá'u'lláh, pp. 6-7.
9. The World Order of Bahá'u'lláh, pp. 64-65
10. The World Order of Bahá'u'lláh, p. 10.

p11. Messages to the Bahá'í World, 1950-1957 (Wilmette: Bahá'í Publishing Trust, 1971), p. 155.

12. The Advent of Divine Justice (Wilmette: Bahá'í Publishing Trust, 1990), p. 35.

13. The World Order of Bahá'u'lláh, p. 152.

Table of Contents: Albanian :Arabic :Belarusian :Bulgarian :Chinese_Simplified :Chinese_Traditional :Danish :Dutch :English :French :German :Hungarian :Italian :Japanese :Norwegian :Persian :Portuguese :Romanian :Russian :Spanish :Turkish :Ukrainian :