More Books by Administrative Order, Continuity

1965 Mar 09 Appointment of Guardian
1966 May 27 Guardianship and the UHJ
1974 Jul 25 Infallibility of the Guardian
1977 Aug 22 Clarification on Infallibility
1981 Jan 2-4 Counsellors Conference in Langenhain
1983 Oct 23 Social and Economic Development
1984 Oct 25 Universal House of Justice - Power of Elucidation
1988 May 31 UHJ Letter to NSA New Zealand
1988 May 31 Women and UHJ Membership
1988 Sept 25 Function of Research Department Various terms
1989 Aug 27 UHJ Letter 19 day Feast
1989 Aug 28 Issues Related to the Nineteen Day Feast
1993 Feb 14 Membership in Amnesty International
1993 Feb 7 Issues concerning community functioning
1994 May 19 response to US NSA
1994 Oct 10 External Affairs Strategy
1995 Apr 27 Separation of Church and State
1995 Mar 14 Language Concerns of Persian Friend in Australia
1995 May 18 Administration by Email
1995 May 18 Making Suggestions
1996 Aug 02 Confidentiality and Spiritual Assemblies
1996 Feb 18 Authority of the Universal House of Justice
1996 Jul 2 UHJ Criticism
1996 Jul 24 Dating of Will and Testament of Abdu'l-Baha
1996 July 02 Criticism of Institutions
1996 Jun 14 Infallibility Women on House of Justice
1996 Oct 22 Authentication and Authority
1997 Jan 31 Mason Remey and Those who Followed him
1997 Jun 03 Interpretational Authority of the House of Justice
1997 June 04 Covenant-Breaking and the Hands
1997 Mar 30 Meaning of 'Umumi re UHJ Membership
1997 May 30 Creation of Regional Baha'i Counsels
1998 Feb 08 Materialistic Elements in Academic Scholarship
1999 Feb 22 Rank of Counsellors
1999 Mar 01 Breaking a Tie Vote - Who Constitute Minorities
2000 Oct 29 Tranquility Zones
2000 Sept 29 Continental Pioneer Committees
2001 Apr 10 UHJ 19 Day Feast
2001 Dec 20 ITC Us BC Americas Clusters
2001 Dec 20 UHJ Us BC Americas Clusters
2001 Jan 29 UHJ Institution of the counselors
2001 Jan 29 UHJ Withdrawal
2002 Jul 30 Revised - Development of Institution of Huququ'llah
Administrative Committees
Free Interfaith Software

Web - Windows - iPhone








Administrative Order, Continuity : 1993 Feb 14 Membership in Amnesty International
The Universal House of Justice
The Bahá'í World Centre
Department of the Secretariat
14 February 1993
Dear Bahá'í Friend,

The Universal House of Justice has received your letter of 4 January 1992 seeking guidance on membership by Bahá'ís in the organization Amnesty International. We have been instructed to provide the following reply.

The House of Justice warmly acknowledges your devoted work with the organization since becoming a member in 1981, and it can appreciate your apprehension over learning in a discussion with another Bahá'í that membership by Bahá'ís in Amnesty International is not permitted. There is no question as to the merits and great services rendered by Amnesty International, nor of the parallels between a number of its goals and those of the Bahá'í Faith. However, problems could arise if you, as a member of the organization, were called upon to undertake actions which would be politically hazardous to Bahá'ís residing in other lands, or which conflict with Bahá'í principles.

As you point out, Amnesty International, from its own viewpoint, is a non-political organization; however, its definition of "politics" is different from that used in the context of Bahá'í teachings. In addition, Amnesty International states that it is opposed to the death penalty in all cases and without reservation, while the law of Bahá'u'lláh expressed in the Kitáb-i-Aqdas is that the death penalty is applicable for murder and arson under certain circumstances.

Even though it is not appropriate for Bahá'ís to become members of Amnesty International, its humanitarian aspects make it possible for Bahá'ís to have friendly relationships with the organization. Thus, Bahá'ís are encouraged to feel free to collaborate as individuals in certain Amnesty International's projects, while retaining the right to abstain form participation in actions which could conflict with Bahá'í principles.

Regarding the enquiry in the penultimate paragraph of your letter, the Universal House of Justice had not established a list of different organizations that the Bahá'í Faith should not support. An important distinction, however is drawn between association with other movements and actual membership. In general Bahá'ís are encouraged to collaborate with all others who are working towards the same goals as the Faith. Bahá'ís are not permitted, however, to be members of certain secret societies, of the religious organizations of other Faiths, of political organizations or, of course, of organizations whose goals are in conflict with the Bahá'í principles. For example, Bahá'ís would gladly work together with Christians in humanitarian activities, but a Baha'i, believing in Bahá'u'lláh, cannot be a member of a Christian church which believes that Christ has not yet returned.

It is hoped that information provided herein will be of assistance to you in attaining peace of mind and heart over this issue, To this end will the Universal House of Justice offer prayers in the Holy Shrines on your behalf.

With loving Bahá'í greetings,
Lorana Kerfoot
For Department of the Secretariat
cc: Counsellor Polin Rafat
National Assembly of

Table of Contents: Albanian :Arabic :Belarusian :Bulgarian :Chinese_Simplified :Chinese_Traditional :Danish :Dutch :English :French :German :Hungarian :Italian :Japanese :Norwegian :Persian :Portuguese :Romanian :Russian :Spanish :Turkish :Ukrainian :